shoebox_dw: (garfield well-informed)
Hey, remember that time I actually got published? Y'know, the article about the comedy...Right, moving on now.

So I've been giving a bit of thought to PopMatters again, in re: some of my essays past and hopefully future, and in browsing the Submissions request page came across...of all things...a call for monthly columnists.

What? OK, yes, it's a stretch. Linking the state of modern pop-culture to the Human Condition is not one of my strong points. Actually, the state of modern pop-culture isn't my strong point, so much.

Still...that phrase in the headline, 'intellectual misfits', kinda intrigues. This would seem to cover a person who is demonstrably capable of entertaining reading audiences from a mind stuffed with fragments like "Lt. Columbo's first name really isn't Philip, that comes from a trivia encyclopedia that threw it in as a coypright trap, and Trival Pursuit duly picked it up".

Anyway, my previous editor was encouraging re: future submissions, so it can't hurt to work something up. The only issue I have is in coming up with a linking topic, as outlined. I'd like to try a humourous/snarky slant of some sort, in keeping with my strengths, but that leaves a biggish gap in re: what exactly. General-purpose snark might lead me to start rambling again. Reality TV, my previous speciality, wouldn't really work on a monthly basis.

This is where we stand as of even date. The call is open until the New Year, so I've got a bit of time to work it out. If anyone has any ideas (and no, the number of a good therapist doesn't count) by all means let me know...
shoebox_dw: (self discovery)
I have very good friends.

This became evident during this past four-day stay-cation weekend. I had some paid days to burn off and decided to spend them questing a little further in search of feedback. It having occurred to me during that last fit of whining about it that I hadn't ever actually just, y'know, asked people for some.

My first foray involved an LJ review site. After checking out some of their previous reviews, I applied with the pleasant assurance that they'd find me a step above the herd, at the least. No emo poetry on this journal!

Ah, yeah. I'm still pretty proud of the 'no emo poetry' thing, no question, but - well, if you're reading this, chances are you know where we go from here. The general gist involved too much rambling, also a 'lack of interesting or engaging content', specifically the personal touch. I needed to take chances, to 'spill my guts'...or at least, something like the 'story of how you once almost got a tattoo on your right breast'.

(The best thing about the whole experience was actually Shoemom's failure to pick up the hypothetical there, when I asked her to read the review. "You did WHAT? On WHERE?")

Didn't help much in dealing with the criticism, though. The ensuing crisis of confidence, here @ Shoe Central, is when I developed a new theory of true friendship: it's what causes the people you run panicking to over bad reviews, instead of merely patting your hand and going "Mean ol'critic!', to instead take the time to gently-but-firmly point out that yes, you have flaws, but no, it's by no means the end of the world, let alone your writing career. Although you're right, nobody else cares about the damn comedy team already.

Look, the reason I don't get deep into the personal around here is pretty simple: The Shoe story is just really, really boring, with a side order of unpleasant. There is verbal abuse and depression and struggles with weight and nerdiness, and occasional existential crises, and that one nagging incident where memory tells me I saw an episode of a favourite TV series, I discovered later, about a year before it was actually frelling made. (No, it doesn't hurt much, but it does make the Matrix flicks rather uncomfortable viewing.) 

Outside the immediate region of my navel, there's also the part where the one Shoesis is a gorgeous slender blonde chick with so little self-esteem Shoemom and I have had to rescue her from no less than five total losers over the past few years... Eventually we'll have to get into the story of the one paternal uncle who's contrived to drive three wives to nervous breakdowns while accumulating five kids, and trust me, neither of us wants that.

Put bluntly, I am inclined both by nature and nurture to suck it up, princess. Even listing the above broad outlines gives me an uncomfortable sense of over-reaching both peoples' interest and sympathy. Thus - not un-naturally I'd thought - I've been treating my online life as a distraction from all that, trying to find topics much more interesting and engaging while treating of my personal life in a gentle, inconsequential fashion to avoid it intruding. I do believe this qualifies for both the orthodox and Alanis definitions of irony.

The other problem draws on from that one - I've been treating this blog as a writing project. Which is fine as far as it goes, but does leave me alarmingly dependent on the goodwill of audiences; as was gently-but-constructively brought home to me this weekend, you can't just leave your rough drafts lying around without people coming to the conclusion that they might as well wait until things get sorted out.

Especially when you're in as dire need of a firm-handed editor as I am. I do ramble hopelessly, I know that; albeit you'd be amazed at what I manage to take out. It doesn't help that my first taste of online writing success came in an environment (ie, TWoP-style Idol recaps) in which I was not only praised but encouraged to be clever at length on multiple obscure topics. I came away from it with perhaps rather an inflated sense of myself as too precious for words.

So...I have some things to work on, and more to think about. I have to find a more suitable place for my essay-style pop-culture pieces, is what I think first of all. I do have some decent ideas in that direction. In the meanwhile...well, the people that have stuck around in some cases since the beginning, thanks. I now have a much clearer idea of how not to try your patience, as much. Although the comedy team may still be making occasional appearances...look, I don't get on your case about Dr Who, you leave me to Bob & Ray. And somehow we'll figure it all out.
shoebox_dw: (gf amazing talents)
So  I was feeling vaguely depressed yesterday for several small reasons that need not concern us here...

...Well, OK, one of them had to do with the fact that my ouchy wisdom tooth now won't be coming out for three more weeks. Also, there was the rather unsettling discovery that a big chunk of those Statcounter hits I'd been cherishing were in fact mere random visits to friends pages. Yes, kids, I'm just that petty.

Anyhoo, I decided to frisk myself up a bit generally by setting up on WordPress. Pretty much the identical blog, mind; a mirror I suppose you'd call it. I plan on cross-posting for a good while yet, and maintaining my friendslinks for long past that.

It's only...well, I've been wanting to sort of step outside the LiveJournal mode for awhile now. I love a lot of the features here - the allowable visual creativity is amazing, for starters - but the overwhelming focus on community isn't really serving my goals, anymore. Basically I wanted to see what it felt like to be a Real Live Blogger. Eventually, I'd like to try hosting it on my own website, containing other writing as well.

That's the other part of the equation. I have given up on denying I like feedback. A lot. If I'm going to branch out wildly in all literary directions - well, I've got the ideas, I've almost got them organised, and the only excuse left is whether or not people in that wider world would be interested. I feel like the WordPress setup might be easier than LJ's to gauge that.

So...uh...yeah, as you were. Oh, if anybody knows of a good cross-poster or other WP widget, by all means share.
shoebox_dw: (i need a hug)
 Man, it’s quiet around here (the office) today. Boredom is when you start checking Statcounter every hour-on-the-hour to see if anyone’s responded to your blogging brilliance.
 
Wednesday is when you keep seeing zeroes.
 
Seriously, what do we need a midweek for anyhow? Why can’t we skip straight from Tuesday (still pleasantly engaged and proactive) to Thursday (almost the weekend, yay!)? I mean, I’d still be carefully organizing order worksheets in a binder and calling it meaningful employment, but at least it’d be over way faster.
 
…Yeah, sorry, the work thing is starting to poke thru the distraction thing again. Awhile ago, my boss came back from HR to tell me that there’ll almost certainly be a spot for me come August; the trick was keeping myself at the top of the waiting list. In short, while I was of course free to explore my options at any time, the current best option here was that I should just stick my nose to a hard substance and wait it out. Come August, if it didn’t work out, the market would still be wide open.
 
shoebox_dw: (quill)
So enough with this footling around with the funnie radio personalities (or possibly more accurately, chronicling their footling around); it's time to settle down to serious Life Lessons, boys and girls. No more whiling away the shining hours with the dulcet tones of a Jane Austen audio book - that hour is past due for improvement. For instance...

...Oh, hell, you don't care, do you? And neither do I, really. At least, not enough to turn this blog into a self-help bestseller at this late date. As a previous commenter astutely mentioned, I do find myself standing at something of a personal and professional crossroads these days, and while that particular topological feature is invariably fascinating on the immediate scale, they do tend to lack severely in pure panoramic splendor.
If I'm dying, or the cat's dying, or somebody from Random House offers me a zillion dollars to become senior editor, or anything else at Shoe Central is otherwise in danger of turning me into Mitch Albom Lite, I'll let you know, OK? Otherwise, we'll just skip the Harsh Reality angle for the time being. Possibly even the entire summer.

It doesn't help that, when I went to compose a rant about the difficulties of a wannabe fiction author instead, I discovered I'd already covered that base six months ago. I mean, really, how pathetic is that? I don't even have literary pretensions, I have literary diffident suggestions.

This is all I suppose what comes of developing my critical faculties before my creative ones; having honed to a fine - perhaps overfine - point the ability to tell worthwhile literature from drek, said faculty steadfastly refuses to allow me to put anything down on paper until it's very very sure I'm not going to embarrass it.
It's quite nice about the whole situation, you understand; willing to give me every chance to improve, even becoming rather fond of being taken for long walks while I try to unsnarl the logical tangles and become philosophical about genre cliches and all the other possibly-mildly-pretentious-after-all hooh-hah outlined in the earlier entry. But it's absolutely firm in re: the production end of the thing, and really, I can't blame it.

Interlude

Apr. 16th, 2008 03:28 pm
shoebox_dw: (lucy)
So I haven’t been spending all my time lately extracting double-entendres from perfectly harmless comic media. I’ve also been very busy trying to avoid calling stores to make sure their contest signs are up.
 
…Long story. Let’s just say the boss is on vacation and left some makework projects for when things got slow, and this is the last one. I’m not one of the people for whom the prospect of spending lots of time on the phone is an ideal morale-booster at any time, and especially not while trying to figure out if I still care about this job generally.
The past few weeks my imagination – while not otherwise occupied with ensuring my resume gives the impression that, when an employer says ‘Call those stores,’ I immediately hop to - has been soaring pleasantly afield from retail, to publishing or library science or similar academia…especially since an HR-type friend told me I could probably substitute experience for actual halls of ivy in most cases. Maybe I could just print out this blog and go from there…
 
Which reminds me, thank you much everyone who offered those nice comments to my original post on the subject. I hadn’t even thought about a history-related job before that, and you see where it’s led? (No, not there! Geez.)
 
shoebox_dw: (kermit muppet show)

So I got a note from my editor yesterday telling me that he was very pleased with the results of my condense-and-focus job on the article…

[pause while those who know me well pick their jaws up from the floor]

…thank you. At any rate, his only major changes involved tweaking my idiosyncratic grammar into mass-magazine mode…which was kind of a peculiar experience. Not unpleasant, per se; believe me, nobody should be crushed at the discovery that the general public doesn’t share my stream of consciousness.

Just…well, by now I’ve got used to the thing having a certain rhythm and flow – my rhythm - and it feels decidedly odd to have it go off among strangers and come back sounding so carefully mature. [snif] My little article, all grown up and ready to stun the world…

Or something. I’ll know in about two-three weeks, he says, when the article goes up onsite. He also says there’s going to be a reference to this blog in the footer to the article…meaning I suddenly have a whole new set of literary anxieties.

This is after all a very classy magazine – I can tell, because a friend who holds a professorship in political science has heard of it. Which means these very classy readers are going to land @ Shoe Central expecting, like, reams of thoughtful, sensitive pop-culture critiquage, and you can’t just cheerily explain it was all a fluke, ha ha, and hope you like the Transformers review!

Thus I have only a fortnight or so to reinvent myself as a sophisticated, culturally-aware literati of whom same would not be wholly embarrassed to be seen engaging in discussion. Basically, I’m thinking of referring to the French Revolution a whole lot from here on in.

Ooh, and post-modernism. I have never had any clear idea what that means, except that Andy Warhol mocked it a lot, and boy howdy did that turn out to be the place where enthusiasm goes to die. However, it apparently has a lot to do with ‘theory’ and ‘irony’, so I figure I get the usage down pat enough to drop it into casual conversation (“The theoretical irony of robots philosophizing in Transformers is, like, mega-post-modernist, dude!”), and I’m totally covered in any discussion past 1952.

More immediately, this puts paid to my ambition to be the sole Oscar-free blog of 2008...

shoebox_dw: (bob & ray)
Real quick this time; my friend [profile] solo_1 tells me that if I (re)post my Bob & Ray opus, she'll read it. At which point it occurred to me I was perhaps feeling a little over-conscientious not to just go ahead and inflict the ruddy thing on the readership once again, given that there is after all the option not to read.

So...please ignore, those who either aren't Solo or are starting to worry about me. All others welcome. :)

As per usual, feedback not only welcomed but encouraged, either by email or using the comments template below...I've set the comments to pre-screen, so they'll come to me first, at which point you can let me know if you'd rather they be posted or not.

Would-be copyright violators, however, should be advised that I have an in-depth knowledge of the Biblical book of Revelation and would not be at all hesitant to interpret it all over your sorry butts.

Thanks much!

shoebox_dw: (garfield monday)
So I'm sitting here wearing my cashmere sweater.

It's kind of like a Bucket List thing, this sweater purchase. While I have no interest whatsoever in actually seeing the movie - as Roger Ebert put it, wouldn't it be nice if just for once, a movie opened with a white character extolling the virtues of Morgan Freeman? - I have always been kind of sympathetic to the general idea. 

I suppose it involves some misdirected wedding-planning instincts, too; I can't have the poufy ivory dress with the rosebud-embroidered bodice (mental pattern borrowed liberally from Catherine Cookson novels), so the ridiculously expensive sweater is like the prize for growing out of it already. You may not have a man, self, but by God you are a successful, sophisticated woman!

Thus, here I sit in genuine two-ply Jones New York Luxe cashmere knit, v-necked, heather grey with a silver-sequinned neckline. Oh, yes, there are sequins. I'm not quite that grown-up, yet. I did however carefully save the little packet with the extras, instead of tossing them up in the air and squealing with glee, so, y'know, progress. I’m so pleased with myself I’m not even going to tell you how long I waited for it to go on sale, which discount is frankly none of your business anyway…
 
shoebox_dw: (garfield rabid moth)
Public service announcement: I realise the season for Hallowe'en house decorating is well over, but as long as the ghosties are still dangling from the bushes I feel it my duty to point out a couple things:

1. You know that white fuzzy stuff that's supposed to represent cobwebs? Yes, cobwebs. Those eerily filmy things that hang round neglected corners and sometimes wash over neglected furniture. See, the keywords here are eerily and filmy. Merely plumping great wads of fuzzy stuff all over the lawn suggests that neglect has not so much led to gloom as a cheery sort of occult pillow fight, or perhaps a cosmic Tide commercial. Especially after it rains and the people passing are all 'ooh, I wonder how they're going to pick all that up when they're done'.

2. On the other hand, dying the clumps of fuzzy stuff neon orange? Is truly scary, if only because one fears for the human race if people capable of missing the point that badly are allowed to mingle their genetic material.
Read more... )
shoebox_dw: (quill)
Public service announcement: Bully the little stuffed blogging bull, whose ongoing attempt to catalogue the entire PG Wodehouse canon stands as as a source of inspiration to online-journal-keepers everywhere (primarily because being left in the dust by a fuzzy toy would be pretty damn embarrassing) has finally got round to one of the finest comic novels in the English language.

Be it known that we at Shoe Central are seriously considering putting failure to chortle within two seconds after clicking through that link on our personal shortlist of Reasons Not to Trust Anyone Who Doesn't. Or at least looking at them kind of funny.

Anyway. It's Day One of life after sinus infection, and yours truly is finally starting to sit up and take notice. Quips have been exchanged with friends; online fiction has been perused, the iPod has been refreshed with new audiobooks. The dancing-girl illusion has been stared at right up until I realised I was trying to coolly analyze why it kept coming out 'right-brained', which on account of I'm pretty slow on the Net-gag uptake took awhile. The creative juices are, beyond a doubt, well and truly stirring.
shoebox_dw: (quill)
It occurs to me that, what with one thing and another - mainly deciding which cool blog widgets to install - I've embarked on a writing project without actually explaining what that project is, properly. So for the benefit of all [glances at new statcounter widget] two of my audience, also a freebie entry for yours truly:

It all started round about when summer ended. As it happens, I'm one of those mildly annoying people whose internal calendar is permanently set to September = time to get serious. So I looked around for something really meaningful to fix, some life change that really needed me to pitch in and exert the willpower to the utmost, and came up with...

...well, after the total wardrobe overhaul got shot down in flames over the $110 peasant blouse, it was either this or cutting down on the chocolate intake.

shoebox_dw: (gf bucky pointing)
So it's Day One of the Great Writing Experiment - in which yours truly spends an hour a day writing something, anything - and I'm sitting here sicker than a dog. Which you'd think I'd be used to by now as a monthly occurrence, but nooooo, somehow I always end up with new and exciting modes of crampage. Some perverse prototype version of forgetting the pain of childbirth, I s'pose.

Anyhoo...let's see...yeah, not much else going on around here. The books all say write what you know, but they never say what to do if what you know isn't all that exciting. Like, yay, I had cake today. (Although, don't get me wrong, it was massively good cake. Someday, if you're very very nice to me, I'll share the secret recipe for Shoemom's chocolate decadence).

Turns out on closer examination most of my blogging inspirations work by tagging on to some inherently cool stuff - comics, say, or celebrity gossip. As noted in the previous 'whoo-hoo-I'm-back' entry, I don't even watch TV, much, and the stuff that I do watch is hampered by the fact that I'm in Canada. We're Number Two! Is there a market for six-month-old Top Chef recaps?

shoebox_dw: (quill)
“Talent isn’t genius, and no amount of energy can make it so. I want to be great, or nothing.”
-- Louisa May Alcott, Little Women

“Don’t wanna end up a cartoon,
in a cartoon graveyard –
Bonedigger, bonedigger
Lost in the moonlight…”
-- Paul Simon, You Can Call Me Al

As you can see, mentally composing this entry on the trials and tribulations of a wannabe novelist has left me just a tad bemused. All I was asking my inner Self, I thought, was a very simple question: What do I have to say? And it just kept on quoting Socrates at me: “All I know for sure, is that I know nothing.”
So I pressed it for clarification, and it responded with the above pearls of. Which was an improvement inasmuch as Paul Simon is lots more hummable than Greek philosophy…but led to disturbing realizations about my own personal place in the Human Experience.

Specifically, I don't seem to have one. Read more... )
shoebox_dw: (Default)
...Now, just what the blazes do I put in it?

 I mean, the one topic on which I can demonstrably write stuff many people read - Canadian Idol - doesn't start for weeks. And frankly my life in the meantime is not exactly of that special calibre of fascinating that makes publishing houses glance up. (Although I have been told my wails re: getting up for work in midwinter are really quite, uh, artistic. Operatic, even. But hey, I'm Canadian, where's the fun in that?)
At any rate, I need to post something. I've got this journal all set up and it's gorgeous and I truly hate staring at blank space, especially when it's in back of my eyeballs. So as a kind of mental ipsum lorem text, here's a random musing from a year or so back on Kids' TV...

…You have to realise, I've been around this stuff in one form or another for about ten years now - starting with managing the children's section in the bookstore...onward through the TV-addict nephews...through the discovery that when I'm home in between temp assignments TreehouseTV makes for a nicer background hum than Jerry Springer.
In short, I've developed something of an immunity - it's almost become a minor hobby. As a public service, I herewith provide TV Coping Mechanisms for Bored Grownups:

Key: AVO - American Viewers Only
B/CVO -British/Commonwealth Viewers Only

--Practice sprinting for the remote as soon as you hear the Barney theme begin. Time yourself on speed, distance and how fast you can subsequently remove the loveable purple spawn-of-something-deeply-unholy from your consciousness.

--During Dora the Explorer, count how many times the Map sings 'I'm the Map!, I'm the Map!' in succession. (Twelve, is my rough estimate.) Bonus: If you listen closely, you can actually hear the voice actor becoming more and more desperate for air from eight repetitions onwards.

--AVO: Mentally redub Bob the Builder into the original British accents. The machines will still be whining incessantly, but at least they'll sound cuter doing it.

--In light of the fact that Blue's Clues recently sent Steve off to college, take bets on how many room-mates he'll go through in the first six months. "Dude talks back to his soap dish!!"

B/CVO - Appreciate the minor miracle that is UK stop-motion animation. If possible, catch an ep or two of Wind in the Willows or Brambly Hedge.

--Decide how many of the weird subtexts in The Toy Castle can be attributed to the fact that it's ballet-dancing-based, and how many are just plain strange. For example, who decreed there should be human-sized Frog Twins, Frieda and Frederick, involved; and why they're dressed up as the King and Queen of Hearts. For extra credit, work up a scary campfire story for next summer starring human-sized frogs with enormous bright sparkly blood-crimson mouths and Scarlett O’Hara accents.

 --Whilst suffering through yet another 'realistically' annoying toddler character, entertain yourself by picturing how long they'd last in your childhood...the one that featured Dad and his belt.

--As Bear in the Big Blue House opens, and the big ol' hunk-a-fur is 'sniffing' you - in extreme close up and quite audibly - try hard not to think all the things you're thinking.

--Confirm what you've long suspected - that the Berenstain Bears' real given names are in fact supposed to be ‘Mama’, ‘Papa’, ‘Sister’ and ‘Brother’...this despite the fact that everyone else in their furry Bearverse has a moniker like ‘Fred’ or ‘Lizzie’. Speculate on what name you'd rather send your son through life with, 'Brother' or 'Sue'.

--Wonder what age Little Bear et al. have to be before clothes become a requirement. I imagine a little Bar (Bear?) Mitzvah-esque ceremony around age 14 or so: "Son, it's time you knew the truth...you're naked. Go, put these on and cover your shame forevermore."

--B/CVO: Think of the strangest possible cartoon character you can. Like, oh, say, a mini-snowmobile. Then turn on Wumpa's World, set in the darkest Arctic, and lo and behold...two of them. Pink and blue. Named Zig and Zag, in case you were wondering.

--Appreciate the rare-but-wonderful moments of genuine for-all-ages wit that sneek in here and there...like in Wumpa's World, when Wumpa the Walrus decides to learn ballet...cue walrus, fluffy pink tutu peeking out under his parka, assuming third position. Or the bit on Bear in the Big Blue House starring identical otters Pip and Pop: “Hey, sure! ‘Adventure’ is our middle name!!” “Uh, no, that’s your middle name. Mine’s Angelica, remember?”

Profile

shoebox_dw: (Default)
shoebox_dw

June 2009

S M T W T F S
  12 3456
7 8910111213
14 1516171819 20
21 222324 252627
282930    

Tags

Syndicate

RSS Atom

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags